Astral Limited vs Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited
An objective side-by-side of ASTRAL and SHAILY, both in Plastics Products: valuation, profitability, growth, balance sheet, ownership and share-price performance. Where one number is clearly better on its own terms (lower P/E, higher ROE), it is shaded. That is a description, not a recommendation.
Prices as of 2026-11-06 close
Latest results: ASTRAL Sep 2026 · SHAILY Sep 2026
At a glance
- Astral Limited is the larger company by market value, about 2.4 times the size of Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited.
- On trailing earnings, Astral Limited trades at the lower P/E (59.3 against 75.2).
- Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited earns the higher return on equity (26.0% against 14.0%).
- Over three years Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited has grown profits faster (69% a year against 7%).
- Over the past year the share prices returned -13.6% (ASTRAL) and +33.9% (SHAILY).
| Metric | Astral ASTRAL |
Shaily Engineering SHAILY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | ₹33,678 Cr | ₹14,010 Cr |
| Share price | ₹1,253.60 | ₹3,046.00 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 59.27 | 75.21 |
| P/B | 8.30 | 19.57 |
| EV/EBITDA | 30.51 | 45.44 |
| PEG | 8.47 | 1.09 |
| Dividend yield | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 14.0% | 26.0% |
| ROCE | 20.0% | 29.0% |
| Operating margin | 15.5% | 28.7% |
| Sales (TTM) | ₹7,196 Cr | ₹1,087 Cr |
| Net profit (TTM) | ₹568 Cr | ₹186 Cr |
| Growth | ||
| Latest quarter sales YoY | +26.0% | +24.5% |
| Latest quarter profit YoY | -5.6% | +19.5% |
| Sales CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +18.0% |
| Profit CAGR 3Y | +7.0% | +69.0% |
| Sales CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | — |
| Profit CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | — |
| Financial strength | ||
| Debt/Equity | 0.06 | 0.25 |
| Interest cover | 11.93 | 14.58 |
| Ownership | ||
| Promoter holding | 54.2% | 41.1% |
| Promoter change (4 qtrs) | +0.01 pp | -2.63 pp |
| Price performance | ||
| Return 1M | -12.19% | -1.27% |
| Return 3M | -13.07% | -9.51% |
| Return 1Y | -13.55% | +33.91% |
| Return YTD | -9.72% | +34.68% |
| Technical condition | ||
| Technical score | 9 | 39 |
| RS rating (1-99) | 34.00 | 82.00 |
| % vs 200-DMA | -16.30% | +13.55% |
| RSI (14) | 31.74 | 48.76 |
| % from 52-week high | -29.12% | -15.74% |
