Balrampur Chini Mills Limited vs EID Parry India Limited
An objective side-by-side of BALRAMCHIN and EIDPARRY, both in Sugar: valuation, profitability, growth, balance sheet, ownership and share-price performance. Where one number is clearly better on its own terms (lower P/E, higher ROE), it is shaded. That is a description, not a recommendation.
Prices as of 2026-09-21 close
Latest results: BALRAMCHIN Jun 2026 · EIDPARRY Mar 2026
At a glance
- Balrampur Chini Mills Limited is the larger company by market value, about 1.1 times the size of EID Parry India Limited.
- Balrampur Chini Mills Limited earns the higher return on equity (9.0% against -7.5%).
- Over three years Balrampur Chini Mills Limited has grown profits faster (10% a year against -9%).
- Over the past year the share prices returned +27.8% (BALRAMCHIN) and -34.8% (EIDPARRY).
| Metric | Balrampur Chini BALRAMCHIN |
EID Parry EIDPARRY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | ₹14,043 Cr | ₹12,473 Cr |
| Share price | ₹663.65 | ₹700.90 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 37.85 | — |
| P/B | 3.39 | 1.42 |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.87 | 38.64 |
| PEG | 3.78 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 9.0% | -7.5% |
| ROCE | 9.0% | 18.0% |
| Operating margin | 11.3% | 4.1% |
| Sales (TTM) | ₹6,366 Cr | ₹10,169 Cr |
| Net profit (TTM) | ₹371 Cr | ₹-655 Cr |
| Growth | ||
| Latest quarter sales YoY | +6.1% | +868.7% |
| Latest quarter profit YoY | -14.4% | -23.9% |
| Sales CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +3.0% |
| Profit CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | -9.0% |
| Sales CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | +16.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5Y | -4.0% | +8.0% |
| Financial strength | ||
| Debt/Equity | 0.77 | 0.40 |
| Interest cover | 7.30 | -0.77 |
| Ownership | ||
| Promoter holding | 42.9% | 41.3% |
| Promoter change (4 qtrs) | +0.00 pp | -0.27 pp |
| Price performance | ||
| Return 1M | -13.49% | -13.50% |
| Return 3M | +23.68% | -2.10% |
| Return 1Y | +27.80% | -34.82% |
| Return YTD | +49.34% | -32.26% |
| Technical condition | ||
| Technical score | 46 | 20 |
| RS rating (1-99) | 85.00 | 20.00 |
| % vs 200-DMA | +25.86% | -16.52% |
| RSI (14) | 47.63 | 27.51 |
| % from 52-week high | -15.02% | -37.31% |
