Balrampur Chini Mills Limited vs EID Parry India Limited
An objective side-by-side of BALRAMCHIN and EIDPARRY, both in Sugar: valuation, profitability, growth, balance sheet, ownership and share-price performance. Where one number is clearly better on its own terms (lower P/E, higher ROE), it is shaded. That is a description, not a recommendation.
Prices as of 2026-11-06 close
Latest results: BALRAMCHIN Sep 2026 · EIDPARRY Jun 2026
At a glance
- Balrampur Chini Mills Limited is the larger company by market value, about 1.2 times the size of EID Parry India Limited.
- On trailing earnings, EID Parry India Limited trades at the lower P/E (9.3 against 33.8).
- EID Parry India Limited earns the higher return on equity (14.0% against 8.8%).
- Over three years Balrampur Chini Mills Limited has grown profits faster (10% a year against -9%).
- Over the past year the share prices returned +46.0% (BALRAMCHIN) and -39.9% (EIDPARRY).
| Metric | Balrampur Chini BALRAMCHIN |
EID Parry EIDPARRY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | ₹14,186 Cr | ₹11,462 Cr |
| Share price | ₹670.30 | ₹644.10 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.82 | 9.33 |
| P/B | 2.99 | 1.31 |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.38 | 4.42 |
| PEG | 3.38 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 8.8% | 14.0% |
| ROCE | 9.0% | 18.0% |
| Operating margin | 11.7% | 8.7% |
| Sales (TTM) | ₹6,571 Cr | ₹38,836 Cr |
| Net profit (TTM) | ₹419 Cr | ₹1,228 Cr |
| Growth | ||
| Latest quarter sales YoY | +12.3% | +3.4% |
| Latest quarter profit YoY | +89.8% | -32.8% |
| Sales CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +3.0% |
| Profit CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | -9.0% |
| Sales CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | +16.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5Y | -4.0% | +8.0% |
| Financial strength | ||
| Debt/Equity | 0.33 | 0.40 |
| Interest cover | 7.30 | 5.90 |
| Ownership | ||
| Promoter holding | 42.8% | 41.3% |
| Promoter change (4 qtrs) | -0.07 pp | -0.21 pp |
| Price performance | ||
| Return 1M | -5.14% | -7.93% |
| Return 3M | +6.52% | -20.47% |
| Return 1Y | +46.05% | -39.94% |
| Return YTD | +50.83% | -37.75% |
| Technical condition | ||
| Technical score | 71 | 20 |
| RS rating (1-99) | 89.00 | 12.00 |
| % vs 200-DMA | +18.79% | -17.81% |
| RSI (14) | 51.91 | 44.17 |
| % from 52-week high | -14.17% | -40.69% |
