Hatsun Agro Product Limited vs Zydus Wellness Limited
An objective side-by-side of HATSUN and ZYDUSWELL, both in Food - Processing - Indian: valuation, profitability, growth, balance sheet, ownership and share-price performance. Where one number is clearly better on its own terms (lower P/E, higher ROE), it is shaded. That is a description, not a recommendation.
Prices as of 2026-11-05 close
Latest results: HATSUN Sep 2026 · ZYDUSWELL Sep 2026
At a glance
- Hatsun Agro Product Limited is the larger company by market value, about 1.6 times the size of Zydus Wellness Limited.
- On trailing earnings, Zydus Wellness Limited trades at the lower P/E (61.4 against 64.5).
- Hatsun Agro Product Limited earns the higher return on equity (18.6% against 4.2%).
- Over three years Hatsun Agro Product Limited has grown profits faster (30% a year against -10%).
- Over the past year the share prices returned -6.7% (HATSUN) and -2.7% (ZYDUSWELL).
| Metric | Hatsun Agro HATSUN |
Zydus Wellness ZYDUSWELL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | ₹23,714 Cr | ₹15,103 Cr |
| Share price | ₹1,064.60 | ₹474.70 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 64.52 | 61.37 |
| P/B | 12.02 | 2.56 |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.72 | 27.75 |
| PEG | 2.15 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.9% | 0.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 18.6% | 4.2% |
| ROCE | 15.0% | 5.0% |
| Operating margin | 10.8% | 13.1% |
| Sales (TTM) | ₹10,881 Cr | ₹5,014 Cr |
| Net profit (TTM) | ₹368 Cr | ₹246 Cr |
| Growth | ||
| Latest quarter sales YoY | +21.7% | +73.3% |
| Latest quarter profit YoY | -3.7% | +109.6% |
| Sales CAGR 3Y | +11.0% | +21.0% |
| Profit CAGR 3Y | +30.0% | -10.0% |
| Sales CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +16.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | -2.0% |
| Financial strength | ||
| Debt/Equity | 0.91 | 0.54 |
| Interest cover | 4.41 | 3.70 |
| Ownership | ||
| Promoter holding | 73.6% | 69.6% |
| Promoter change (4 qtrs) | +0.47 pp | +0.00 pp |
| Price performance | ||
| Return 1M | -7.43% | -5.51% |
| Return 3M | +16.91% | -10.50% |
| Return 1Y | -6.74% | -2.69% |
| Return YTD | +8.94% | +4.42% |
| Technical condition | ||
| Technical score | 38 | 29 |
| RS rating (1-99) | 76.00 | 56.00 |
| % vs 200-DMA | +9.26% | -3.52% |
| RSI (14) | 49.45 | 43.63 |
| % from 52-week high | -21.12% | -22.42% |
