Lodha Developers Limited vs The Phoenix Mills Limited
An objective side-by-side of LODHA and PHOENIXLTD, both in Construction: valuation, profitability, growth, balance sheet, ownership and share-price performance. Where one number is clearly better on its own terms (lower P/E, higher ROE), it is shaded. That is a description, not a recommendation.
Prices as of 2026-11-05 close
Latest results: LODHA Sep 2026 · PHOENIXLTD Sep 2026
At a glance
- Lodha Developers Limited is the larger company by market value, about 1.5 times the size of The Phoenix Mills Limited.
- On trailing earnings, Lodha Developers Limited trades at the lower P/E (27.0 against 48.1).
- The Phoenix Mills Limited earns the higher return on equity (17.4% against 17.2%).
- Over three years Lodha Developers Limited has grown profits faster (57% a year against 14%).
- Over the past year the share prices returned +0.4% (LODHA) and +24.8% (PHOENIXLTD).
| Metric | Lodha Developers LODHA |
Phoenix Mills PHOENIXLTD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | ₹117,492 Cr | ₹76,042 Cr |
| Share price | ₹1,175.80 | ₹2,126.00 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.00 | 48.06 |
| P/B | 4.65 | 8.36 |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.50 | 29.79 |
| PEG | 0.47 | 3.43 |
| Dividend yield | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 17.2% | 17.4% |
| ROCE | 17.0% | 13.0% |
| Operating margin | 33.1% | 60.2% |
| Sales (TTM) | ₹18,851 Cr | ₹4,582 Cr |
| Net profit (TTM) | ₹4,352 Cr | ₹1,582 Cr |
| Growth | ||
| Latest quarter sales YoY | +17.6% | +3.4% |
| Latest quarter profit YoY | +28.3% | +11.5% |
| Sales CAGR 3Y | +21.0% | +19.0% |
| Profit CAGR 3Y | +57.0% | +14.0% |
| Sales CAGR 5Y | +25.0% | +34.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5Y | +59.0% | +83.0% |
| Financial strength | ||
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | 0.67 |
| Interest cover | 6.97 | 5.89 |
| Ownership | ||
| Promoter holding | 70.3% | 47.2% |
| Promoter change (4 qtrs) | -1.58 pp | -0.01 pp |
| Price performance | ||
| Return 1M | +3.54% | +12.87% |
| Return 3M | -5.94% | +10.13% |
| Return 1Y | +0.38% | +24.80% |
| Return YTD | +10.79% | +14.70% |
| Technical condition | ||
| Technical score | 64 | 82 |
| RS rating (1-99) | 72.00 | 81.00 |
| % vs 200-DMA | +15.26% | +16.23% |
| RSI (14) | 63.93 | 72.34 |
| % from 52-week high | -12.58% | -2.02% |
