Lodha Developers Limited vs The Phoenix Mills Limited
An objective side-by-side of LODHA and PHOENIXLTD, both in Construction: valuation, profitability, growth, balance sheet, ownership and share-price performance. Where one number is clearly better on its own terms (lower P/E, higher ROE), it is shaded. That is a description, not a recommendation.
Prices as of 2026-09-21 close
Latest results: LODHA Jun 2026 · PHOENIXLTD Jun 2026
At a glance
- Lodha Developers Limited is the larger company by market value, about 1.6 times the size of The Phoenix Mills Limited.
- On trailing earnings, Lodha Developers Limited trades at the lower P/E (27.5 against 44.9).
- Lodha Developers Limited earns the higher return on equity (17.7% against 14.0%).
- Over three years Lodha Developers Limited has grown profits faster (57% a year against 14%).
- Over the past year the share prices returned -4.2% (LODHA) and +21.5% (PHOENIXLTD).
| Metric | Lodha Developers LODHA |
Phoenix Mills PHOENIXLTD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | ₹113,712 Cr | ₹68,996 Cr |
| Share price | ₹1,138 | ₹1,929 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.54 | 44.86 |
| P/B | 4.88 | 6.28 |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.10 | 27.38 |
| PEG | 0.48 | 3.20 |
| Dividend yield | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 17.7% | 14.0% |
| ROCE | 17.0% | 13.0% |
| Operating margin | 32.2% | 59.7% |
| Sales (TTM) | ₹18,182 Cr | ₹4,545 Cr |
| Net profit (TTM) | ₹4,129 Cr | ₹1,538 Cr |
| Growth | ||
| Latest quarter sales YoY | +43.1% | +12.8% |
| Latest quarter profit YoY | +103.4% | +23.0% |
| Sales CAGR 3Y | +21.0% | +19.0% |
| Profit CAGR 3Y | +57.0% | +14.0% |
| Sales CAGR 5Y | +25.0% | +34.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5Y | +59.0% | +83.0% |
| Financial strength | ||
| Debt/Equity | 0.43 | 0.48 |
| Interest cover | 6.97 | 5.89 |
| Ownership | ||
| Promoter holding | 70.3% | 47.2% |
| Promoter change (4 qtrs) | -1.59 pp | -0.01 pp |
| Price performance | ||
| Return 1M | -8.23% | +0.21% |
| Return 3M | +22.81% | +3.09% |
| Return 1Y | -4.19% | +21.50% |
| Return YTD | +7.23% | +4.07% |
| Technical condition | ||
| Technical score | 41 | 58 |
| RS rating (1-99) | 73.00 | 68.00 |
| % vs 200-DMA | +11.37% | +6.46% |
| RSI (14) | 44.18 | 54.19 |
| % from 52-week high | -15.39% | -11.10% |
