TATA CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED vs CCL Products (India) Limited
An objective side-by-side of TATACONSUM and CCL, both in Tea: valuation, profitability, growth, balance sheet, ownership and share-price performance. Where one number is clearly better on its own terms (lower P/E, higher ROE), it is shaded. That is a description, not a recommendation.
Prices as of 2026-09-21 close
Latest results: TATACONSUM Jun 2026 · CCL Jun 2026
At a glance
- TATA CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED is the larger company by market value, about 6.9 times the size of CCL Products (India) Limited.
- On trailing earnings, CCL Products (India) Limited trades at the lower P/E (33.0 against 62.0).
- CCL Products (India) Limited earns the higher return on equity (18.5% against 7.3%).
- Over three years TATA CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED has grown profits faster (13% a year against 11%).
- Over the past year the share prices returned -9.2% (TATACONSUM) and +18.5% (CCL).
| Metric | TATA CONSUMER TATACONSUM |
CCL Products CCL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | ₹99,028 Cr | ₹14,281 Cr |
| Share price | ₹1,001 | ₹1,071 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 62.01 | 32.98 |
| P/B | 4.55 | 6.09 |
| EV/EBITDA | 36.12 | 20.33 |
| PEG | 4.77 | 3.00 |
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | 0.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 7.3% | 18.5% |
| ROCE | 9.0% | 16.0% |
| Operating margin | 14.5% | 16.7% |
| Sales (TTM) | ₹19,433 Cr | ₹4,602 Cr |
| Net profit (TTM) | ₹1,597 Cr | ₹433 Cr |
| Growth | ||
| Latest quarter sales YoY | +51.6% | +124.5% |
| Latest quarter profit YoY | -37.7% | +272.7% |
| Sales CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +29.0% |
| Profit CAGR 3Y | +13.0% | +11.0% |
| Sales CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +29.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +16.0% |
| Financial strength | ||
| Debt/Equity | 0.13 | 0.56 |
| Interest cover | 13.93 | 4.62 |
| Ownership | ||
| Promoter holding | 33.8% | 46.1% |
| Promoter change (4 qtrs) | -0.01 pp | +0.02 pp |
| Price performance | ||
| Return 1M | -5.27% | -3.72% |
| Return 3M | -10.09% | -6.76% |
| Return 1Y | -9.25% | +18.49% |
| Return YTD | -16.06% | +13.43% |
| Technical condition | ||
| Technical score | 19 | 33 |
| RS rating (1-99) | 34.00 | 56.00 |
| % vs 200-DMA | -10.73% | -0.10% |
| RSI (14) | 39.26 | 41.23 |
| % from 52-week high | -21.99% | -13.78% |