Larsen & Toubro Limited vs Acme Solar Holdings Limited
An objective side-by-side of LT and ACMESOLAR, both in Engineering - Turnkey Services: valuation, profitability, growth, balance sheet, ownership and share-price performance. Where one number is clearly better on its own terms (lower P/E, higher ROE), it is shaded. That is a description, not a recommendation.
Prices as of 2026-11-05 close
Latest results: LT Sep 2026 · ACMESOLAR Sep 2026
At a glance
- Larsen & Toubro Limited is the larger company by market value, about 19.3 times the size of Acme Solar Holdings Limited.
- On trailing earnings, Larsen & Toubro Limited trades at the lower P/E (26.7 against 38.1).
- Larsen & Toubro Limited earns the higher return on equity (18.5% against 9.0%).
- Over three years Acme Solar Holdings Limited has grown profits faster (149% a year against 17%).
- Over the past year the share prices returned +1.6% (LT) and +41.5% (ACMESOLAR).
| Metric | Larsen & Toubro LT |
Acme Solar ACMESOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | ₹557,226 Cr | ₹28,810 Cr |
| Share price | ₹4,050.00 | ₹407.90 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.67 | 38.11 |
| P/B | 4.93 | 3.45 |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.65 | 23.40 |
| PEG | 1.57 | 0.26 |
| Dividend yield | 0.9% | 0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 18.5% | 9.0% |
| ROCE | 15.0% | 9.0% |
| Operating margin | 10.2% | 86.4% |
| Sales (TTM) | ₹300,903 Cr | ₹2,790 Cr |
| Net profit (TTM) | ₹20,895 Cr | ₹756 Cr |
| Growth | ||
| Latest quarter sales YoY | +15.8% | +89.5% |
| Latest quarter profit YoY | +27.2% | +133.6% |
| Sales CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +16.0% |
| Profit CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | +149.0% |
| Sales CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | +4.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +51.0% |
| Financial strength | ||
| Debt/Equity | 1.24 | 3.30 |
| Interest cover | 5.71 | 1.17 |
| Ownership | ||
| Promoter holding | 0.0% | 71.4% |
| Promoter change (4 qtrs) | +0.00 pp | -12.01 pp |
| Price performance | ||
| Return 1M | +7.43% | -8.99% |
| Return 3M | -0.17% | +6.71% |
| Return 1Y | +1.57% | +41.46% |
| Return YTD | -0.82% | +71.91% |
| Technical condition | ||
| Technical score | 75 | 44 |
| RS rating (1-99) | 64.00 | 90.00 |
| % vs 200-DMA | +3.01% | +23.98% |
| RSI (14) | 72.04 | 48.26 |
| % from 52-week high | -8.78% | -14.47% |
